It was once possible to commit difficult, rebellious and unconventional women to the asylum with only a GP’s signature. Not way back in the distant past either. This was Britain and it was practice until the 1950’s. The women, thus interred, were released only when the institutions closed down in the 1990’s. Regrettable social history which Maggie O’Farrell uses to great effect in her 4th novel. (Her 1st written by the way – she spent 10 years perfecting it!)
Esme is institutionalised in the 1930’s for …. no, for that would be giving it away …. is released in the 1990’s when her asylum is closed. A series of (un)fortunate events brings her to the home of her grandniece, Iris; a businesswoman with a complicated love life; a woman who, had she lived in Esme’s time would without a shadow of a doubt have met the same fate. Iris’s story isn’t the fascinating one, however, and, at times, the contrast between her opportunities and Esme’s is just too obvious. The real strength of the novel lies in the layers of Esme’s story which gradually unfolds through the narrative voices of both Esme and her sister, Kitty. Kitty, now suffering from advanced Alzheimers, can’t remember what she had for her last meal, although she does remember, with startling clarity, the events of 60 years ago, which led her to betray her sister …. The secrets are revealed, slowly but surely, in Kitty’s fractured and disjointed voice, although she only tells us the details which portray her in a light softer than harsh reality …. Esme provides the bitter detail.
And yet I found myself wondering whether Esme’s narration too is unreliable – not in a way which detracts from the injustice served her, but enough to wonder whether she really did have bipolar tendencies, which would have been recognised and treated in a different age. There are enough dubious incidents throughout her childhood to merit the question. Her surprising self-possession and focus upon release are also quite disturbing. Evidence of a real problem or a self-fulfilling prophecy?
There’s no doubt that Maggie O’Farrell has written a powerful, outrage-inspiring and disturbing book. Esme’s stolen life is upsetting. So too, the society of the 1930’s. As is the cavalier attitude of the 1990’s social services. These threads of outrage and sadness run throughout the novel, from the first page to the last. And that ending achieves something I would have thought impossible. It’s poignant and manages to upset me even more than before!
This is an excellent book group read. It’s not often that a page-turner inspires such a wealth of discussion. My group members also related the stories of those they knew who had been similarly affected by these draconian social policies. (And not all the victims were female ….) A number of group members took the book away for a reread. Now that they know what happens, they want to reread and savour …. which is as good as recommendation as there can be and an endorsement that O’Farrell’s 10 years were years well-spent!
P.S Let’s hear it for the 2007 Good Housekeeping Novel of the Year!
P.P.S Recommended for those who loved this, Sebastian Barry’s The Secret Scripture.







































Der Struwwelpeter auf Englisch - Translated by Mark Twain



















Mystic Pig - Richard Katrovas

























The Latin American Challenge

1. The Blue Fox


I just put a book by O’Farrell on my TBR list….After You’d Gone. Have you read this one?
Yes. After You’d Gone is very, very sad. You’ll need tissues for your tears. That said, it’s tremendous!
I loved The Vanishing At of Esme Lennox. Did the ending really end like I think it did? I don’t want to spoil it but am wondering if my eyes were playing tricks on me as I read what Esme did. Did she really? New to this book club online thing. Love to read not sure how to figure out which is the next read and therefore the one that will be discussed.
Welcome chloemaye … and apologies for misleading you.
I’m not running an online book group as such – the posts marked “Book Group” are logs of my real life book group discussions. But don’t let that stop you joining in here. Our next discussion is “The Secret River” by Kate Grenville, followed by “The Good Life” by Jay McIllerney.
As for Esme … yes, I think she did!
I just finished this one and really would have liked to have a group discussion on it!
I really enjoyed this book. I think it would be a good film, as well. And sitting on my TBR stack is After You’d Gone.
A word of advice – have a box of tissues to hand as you read “After You’d Gone”!
I discovered your site as I was looking for reviews for “The Vanishing Act of Esme Lennox.” Just finished the book in one reading on a LOOONG flight from Dulles to SFO. First, the book: to me, quite powerful, touched on so many discussable issues, didn’t moralize, didn’t avoid the consequences of our actions, either. Amazing that I could feel so much for these characters, developed so sparingly.
Now, more: your site interests me so much. I have spent much of my life as a teacher, high school humanities, then televised humanities courses. Now I’m living the life of my dreams, retired early, lots of time to myself as I commute between farm in Kentucky and our new home in SF. Back to YOU…I need structure in my life, in my intellectual and creative life, and I see your blog/web site as one that effectively marshalls your creativity and seems to channel and push your thinking along creative lines. That is why I developed my own blog. Anyway. Your blog inspires me and gives me ideas. I appreciate this so much. Thank you, thank you. Liz
I just finished The Vanishing Act of Esme Lennox, and I am completely confused. SPOILER ALERT!!!! Did she really kill Kitty at the end? And Robert, Esme’s son that Kitty raised, was actually Iris’ father? If someone could please let me know through my email. I hate devoting so much time to a book and then not understanding the outcome.
i just finished reading this book. no one is answering kolleen’s question and i would like to know too! especially if kitty was killed at the end.
******************************************
SPOILER – Read no further if you haven’t read the novel
******************************************
robert is esme’s son and iris’ father.
Sorry to frustrate you, Lucy but I answered Kolleen by email so as not to put the spoiler on the blog.
But I will now seeing as you have asked also. Those who do not wish to know how I have interpreted the ending, read no further.
*********************************************
SPOILER – Read no further if you haven’t read the novel
*********************************************
I believe Esme took her revenge.
I finished this book last night whilst in work, and was left completly dumbstruck by what happened at the end – i’m so glad I found this site to see I was not the only one!!
Albeit the book was fantastic, working in a supported living environment with people who, like esme were put into these awful places for no real reason, it was touching to read and at the same time incredible haunting – well done Maggie O’Farrell, an absolute triumph!
Kate
I read “The Vanishing Act of Esme Lennox” also and like most of you, I too was shocked by the ending. Esme actually killed Kitty?? How? It didn’t even seem like anything happened.
I loved the book but I would like to know what’s going to happen next with Alex and Iris!
I loved this book too! I was searching all morning to find the answer and/or opinions to the ending. I believe Esme killed Kitty in the end but I actually had to reread the ending 3 times for it to sink in! Wow what a great book – so well done. Another fabulous book along the same lines is An Inconvenient Wife – the author escapes me now but it was fantastic also. Happy Reading to all. Thanks for posting this topic.
Hi All,
I, too, was struck by the novel…picked it up randomly in an airport and I’m soooo glad I did. I, too, read the ending over and over — but I’m still not sure. There’s the idea that the sun did not come a second time and Esme was waiting for that, but she rang the bell anyway. And the confusion over which sister was standing and which was sitting. Amazingly subtle like trying to catch snowflakes.
There is another scene I’d like to ask about. It’s the horrible scene when Kitty does actually go to the “home” to see Esme and peers into a padded cell seeing the swathed creature moving slowly against the wall. If that was Esme, and I assume it was, how she managed so much dignity when Iris met her and thereafter is a testament to her character.
Another oddity….for me….we don’t know for sure until she actually gives birth that she’s pregnant. Or, rather, I suspected it could have happened, but only after the fact.
And, thanks for the opportunity to interact with others who’ve read the book. I couldn’t wait to get home from vacation to try to find such a blog.
Carole
Here’s my interpretation that addresses some of the above. (SPOILERS!) Esme used the pillow she had been handling to murder Kitty. The significance of one sister sitting, one standing is that it was Esme standing — for once she had the power, Kitty was in the more helpless position, particularly because of her Alzheimer’s. As for the horrible state Esme was in when Kitty went back to see her, I believe that was right after she had the baby taken away from her. I guess she recovered somewhat over the years. Something I wondered about was why Esme ran away to Russia in reaction to Kitty having caught her and Alex. I’m guessing the author was trying to show that Kitty disrupted yet another family member’s life, but it’s not as if Kitty acted on what she saw. It was just an embarrassing moment — why run away?
I sincerely hope that “The Vanishing Act of Esme…” is not a true story because it is so haunting. From my perspective, it seems Esme sometimes escaped her loveless existence with her family by these “hallucinations.” A child whose mother avoids physical touch – how awful. Trapped in a family whose emotional dimensions are as deep as an insects’ would have driven anyone to occasional madness. What was really appalling to me was when Kitty discovered Esme had a child. Surely she must have realized then that Esme had been raped by the man who’d wanted to marry Esme and rejected her (Kitty). Thus the reason for her emotional turmoil (rape) on that fateful night. Instead, this monster (Kitty) is jealous because Esme actually had sex and she, who was married had not yet done so. Such a person who is so devoid of empathy did deserve whatever wrath Esme handed out. While the ending is so vague, in my imagination, I hope Esme got some justice!
When Esme goes through the box of belongings taken from her at the assylum, she is looking frantically for a piece of green material that she thinks is probably wool. She says that they promised to put it in the box for her. I read the whole book looking for that piece of material and I clearly missed it. Did anyone figure out what it was? It’s driving me crazy!
Oh, incidentally, in response to Raquel, I’m pretty sure Kitty thought that Esme had voluntarily had sex with Jamie, because she’s angry that Esme knew what to do while she, Kitty, didn’t (page 219 paperback). One doesn’t need to understand the mechanics of sex to be raped. I’m giving Kitty the benefit of the doubt here – I think it gave her reason to believe that Esme had wronged her. If she had really understood what Esme had gone through, she would have to have been a monster to leave her there. Mostly, I think, no one loved Esme enough to find out the truth of anything.
Oops, sorry. The missing green cloth was the swaddling blanket. That would have been my guess but I missed the detail.
Im confused as to why Esme was making note of the razor when she was in the bath at Iris’s place and why her name was on the papers as the relative to Esme while she was lockd away.
I think Kitty was jelous about James and that he must of knew the baby was his when he went to viset her. I dont think she realised Esma was raped.
And I just dont understand why her parents never went to see Esme they did’nt seem to care about her at all.
I am so relieved to find this blog! After I read it I couldn’t believe the book was over and I still had so many questions. Nearly all of them have been answered on here, but I did wonder …
Jamie, the boy that raped Esme, later meets the baby boy and says “The son, the heir”. At least I think it was supposed to be Jamie saying it. So I’m wondering, did he see that the baby looked like him and know it was his baby?
Also, this is a much more trivial matter, but are we supposed to believe that Kitty and her husband never had sex, and if so, why not? Was he just so uneducated on it that he didn’t know how, or did he simply have no interest in sex? I thought that part was very curious
I loved this book and can’t wait to to re-read it. I agree with previous posters who said that it would be a fantastic movie!
i’m just after reading t
hi everyone
just finished reading “Vanishing act of Esme…”what a beautiful read it was.It took me less than 24 hours to finish it up- really unputtable.Yes the end seems ever so vague and elusive and, like some had to read it twice just to make sure i understoond it right.
SPOILER
Esme kills her sister.What an act. Still that does not compensate what Kitty did to her.
Esme was perfectly all right a bit rebellious, bizzare, but inteligent woman so ahead of her times…
Such a beautiful story, highly recommended.
XXXX
I just finished the book. As a practicing psychotherapist in the 21st century, the conditions, while not new for me to hear, where nevertheless shocking. I actually felt Esme’s pain, and it shed new light on mental illness and hospitalization.
I am actually not sure if she had a serious mental illness (such as the schizophrenia she was diagnosed with in the book) or some other form, or maybe none at all and a dissociation from herself from the childhood trauma and then the rape.
Kitty on the other hand was doing only what she could. In the time they were in, life was completely different than today’s socitey. Had Esme gone on with her strange and erratic behavior, it is likely Kitty’s “chances” would have been ruined. This is not a justification. Kitty still likely was the one who sealed Esme’s fate.
The only part I did not love was the ending. I don’t think Esme needed to kill Kitty, or that Robert had to be her son. Obviously I am not the author, nor can I change a book, but from the moment Jamie came into the story, the reader knew who he would love, and when she turned hime down, who he would take anyway he could. I am actually not sure why he was sent away, does it mean people knew about the rape? His mother, who hated her so much?
Also, I missed why Esme stayed in Caulstone after she delivered Robert. Also, what did Duncan, Ishbel and Esme’s father say about Robert? It seemed bizzare that those reactions were absent. Didn’t people notice that she left town not even showing a pregnancy, but returned whenever with an baby who was nine months older than he should have been?
Thanks,
Daniel
Daniel: In our book group we read 1000 White Women
which also deal with a young woman being institutionalized against her will by a very wealthy and powerful father. It’s a fantastic book about strong women. The main character is offered a way out of the asylum and the adventure begins. If you haven’t read this one…it is just Fantastic
thanks for the site! I have much better insight into the book! I was confused at the end and now understand.
I feel that Duncan was gay.
I thought he was gay as well and that he only married Kitty to hide that. He used her and hid his “reason” for not being interested. He could also have been interested in her family money
To respond to some people’s comments: To Marcia-I do not think that Duncan was gay. In his day and age, if he was brought up in the high dignitary circles that he was, he most likely would not have come across the mechanics of sex in his daily conversations. He just didn’t know what to do, or was too embarrassed to try. To Gracie- When Jamie said “the son, the heir” I had believed he was speaking directly to Kitty, as in like “oh this is the son everyone has been talking about! I finally get to meet this baby boy, the heir to the [what was Duncan's last name? I forget... Lockhart? Anyways...] throne” (or something similar to that).
And I just have to say… Poor Esme! Her circumstances totally sucked. I don’t even have any other words for it. That her family’s, as many others, sentiments were almost emotionally non-existant, is just terrible. If I didn’t get any postitive recognition or a hug or something from my family/friends regularly, I don’t know what I’d do!
I would also like to add that I thought the Alex/Iris/luke side story was mostly irrelevant to the plot. I mean, it did have it’s moments obviously, but I mostly skipped over whatever was going on in Iris’ life because I didn’t care. I wanted to hear what was going to happen to Esme and hear Kitty’s side of the story, etc.
I believe a sequel is duly in order here.
PS, I just stayed up until 3:15 in the morning finishing the book after receiving it at 9:30 PM earlier. So sorry if my comments seem a little loopy or don’t make much sense. I usually am in bed by 10:45 so this is a stretch now!
PPS, my clock says it is 3:34 AM now, as opposed to the 12:33 PM postmark on the comments.
I just finished “…Esme”. What a sad, sad story – and although fiction, could definitely have happened. Thank you to the people who cleared up the ending – I wasn’t sure if Esme had killed Kitty (thought what was it about the red rope-did she strangle her with it?). But now, yes – I think she smothered her with the pillow. And yes, the green cloth was the swaddling blanket. I think Esme could have gotten better revenge by telling Kitty in front of Esme and Alex what was done to her – and then let Kitty stay in that home alone and unwanted for the rest of her life.
To the poster, Daniel – well, no Robert couldn’t be Kitty’s son-that was the crux of the story. Kitty’s husband never had intercourse with her and in her “society”, she could not have had sex outside of marriage. Also, her chances were ruined anyway. She wanted Jamie-didn’t get him. Instead, ended up in a loveless marriage, betrayed the sister who did love her and stole her child. Esme stayed in Caulstone after Robert was delivered because her family had her committed against her will. They never allowed her release! The baby who was 9 mos old when Kitty brought him home would not necessarily be noticed. Women didn’t bring their babies out with them-nurses were hired to take care of them.
I don’t think Esme was mentally ill at all. I think she was a spirited, sensitive, intelligent, artistic girl who simply defied absurd convention. That was what was so sad-so many women committed to those horrible institutions just because they weren’t Stepford wives.
I can’t stop thinking of this wonderful book. Thank you, Maggie O’Farrell.
Lovely and haunting book! Maggie O’Farrell has given us a real gift with this novel. I too stayed up past my bedtime and read on and on until the wee hours of the morning. Esme was such a complex character and perhaps just a woman ahead of her time. How about Vanessa Redgrave as the newly released Esme? I think the flashbacks to India could be incredible.
What a book! By the way, has anyone else read The Madonnas of Leningrad by Debra Dean? Another very addictive book! Do not pick this one up on Christmas Eve or the festivities will have to wait!
Also loved the book but dreading the inevitable Hollywood version already….One last mystery remaining for me…Does anyone know what Kitty means when she says ‘I didn’t take it’ i(on pg 268 before Esme kills her) Is she referring to the baby or to the green material that wasn’t part of Esme’s belongings when she leaves Cauldstone? Help!
I think that Duncan was probably impotent. I find it hard to believe that even back then, a man wouldn’t know what to do, even if sex wasn’t talked about openly.
I still don’t understand the significance of the rope in the last scene. If Esme smothered Kitty with the pillow, then what did the rope do- was that to signal for the caregivers? If so, why would she pull it right after and thus give away her crime? I enjoyed the book except for the ending. I don’t think it was realistic that Esme would kill her sister, even after all Kitty had done to ruin Esme’s life. I don’t think she was ever really mentally ill, and certainly seemed very calm and “normal” during the couple of days she spent with Iris before she went to see Kitty.
I have just read this book while on vacation. I re-read the last few pages several times until I was able to formulate and conclude that Esme smothered her sister, Kitty. It was very subtle and easily missed. What a powerful story! I am so glad that I came across this website and all of the opinions that were expressed. It helped me understand several issues that I had and I was glad that others shared those views. Words such as “haunting”, “incredible”, “emotional” were perfect adjectives used to describe. It was quite thought provoking and one of those rare novels that stays with you for some time.
I believe Duncan was impotent (or possible gay), because sex is not something that needs to be taught. It is instinctive and requires no education.
I am anxious to read After You’ve Gone. Thank you for the recommendations.
Although Kitty was a wretch for taking Esme’s baby and leaving Esme in the hospital alone, I dont not think that she realized that the baby was the result of the rape. Believing that she took the baby knowing about the rape is easy and fun to do for the drama of it, but is not an accurate assumption. From what I gathered from Kitty’s character throughout the book I think that if she had known about the rape then she would have felt some sympathy for her sister.
^ I agree with Amalee. I think it’s the fact that Kitty and Duncan didn’t even consumate their own marriage (which is why she couldn’t have a child) that if she DID know that Esme was raped, she would have felt sympathy for her sister.
Also based on the fact that Kitty is already guilt ridden as she betrays Esme (maybe without meaning to).
This is one of the many novels which have really moved me although I have to admit I didn’t like the writing style much, O’Farrell has talent in gripping her audience and not letting go.
I too was surprised Esme murdered her sister . It was such a quite backdrop instead of a moment of reckoning and redemption. It didn’t bring closure for me like it could have although I loved the book. Throughout the book Esme adored her Kitty while her parents and society rejected her. Her mother seemed depressed all the time and was emotionally detached and neglectful. Did anyone catch the part in the book about “what mother would let her baby crawl under a cart and die” or did I misread that part? I never understood if Esme accidently killed Hugo, did he die in his sleep or did he die from his mother’s neglect? (maybe I should reread the book too)
My take on the red cord was that it was a symbolic threat of Kitty’s power and ability to ring the nurses and doctors and have Esme taken away against her will at any moment. I too wondered if she used it to strangle…Esme’s character was impulsive and explosive. She was passionate, intelligent, creative and independent and clearly did not want to conform or be owned by 1930’s protocol for women. She also didn’t have parents interested enough to manage or teach her to channel her enthusiasm or sympathize with what she viewed as injustices of the everyday happenings of life that seemed to affect her more. Her character had a heightened sense of awareness to touch, smell, emotion, etc. Her sole support was Kitty who eventually became one of “them” but Kitty’s fate was not much better. She too was a prisoner of loneliness and her lifeline, as wrong as it was, was the baby. I think she felt guilty but rationalized her decision to not take custody of Esma (sealing her fate again) after her opportunity for release when she peeked through the window and saw her in such a graphic state of mental treatment. It frightened me to read about it.
I agree with the other bloggers that Kitty was a product of her environment and slowly accepted what society kept telling her was “abnormal behavior” and that she unknowing and naively sealed Estme’s fate when she answered the doctors question. It broke my heart when she found the unopened letters.
I think the mother of the boy new her son was a bad seed, recognized what happened and that is why she took Esme home and sent her son away. I too was confused about the part regarding the baby being an heir.
Anyone read it twice who can fill in the gaps?
This is a book that makes me so grateful, as a woman, to be living in America during this day and age. What a horrifying story, and very believable. This is book that will stay with me for a long time.
I think that Duncan was gay, as he seemed to be disgusted when Kitty got him to touch her.
I think Hugo died of typhus, as did the nanny, and I think when the women are saying ““what mother would let her baby crawl under a cart and die” they were not referring to anyone in Esme’s family, but to a woman in the asylum whose baby had died and who was inconsolable.
I was struck throughout the book by Esme’s hyper- sensitivity to touch, and thinking how torturous it must have been, especially for her, to be confined in restraints in the asylum. As a child, she seemed to be intellectually brilliant, and physically sensitive to her environment. Are these two connected in some way?
Hello, I just read the vanishing act of esme’ lennox. A truly stunnning and haunting book that leaves you lingering for hours. I think Duncan was gay. Seriously no straight guy (no matter how shy or “uneducated” he is) feels no lust for a pretty girl who is literally begging for it.
I also find it really ironic that Esme who was admitted to a mental institute came out relativly sane, and Kitty who was sane to begin is presented to us with a “mental disorder”.
This site has certainly answered many of my questions…however there is one thing I still don’t get.
At the end, when Iris finds Esme clutching at her knees , Esme says: The Sun, didn’t go in…The sun. It never went in again. so I pulled it anyway”
What is she referring to?
I was wondering about the importance of the blazer?? does their father tell kitty to wap them or something. where did she get the small one from, was it her old one or something?
Loved reading all of these comments. I, too, read this book in a short time. It was so compelling and wonderfully written. Loved it. I was also confused about the comment near the end, “The sun didn’t go in… the sun. It never went in again, so I pulled it anyway.”. Any thoughts? Can’t remember the last time I read and reread a book’s ending, then ran to the internet to find others’ comments…
I just finished this book over a few hours at the request of my mother. She read it quickly last week and wanted my thoughts on the ending.
It is beautifully written and so evocative of the time and period in which it takes place.
Esme was unconventional and extremely intelligent. These traits, combined with her post-traumatic stress from her brother’s and Ayah’s death and the time she spent alone with them, shaped her fate. Her restrictive and cold family life chafed against her spirit. She could not comply.
It is interesting that her sister, who complied wholly with her restrictive environment as best she could, also ends up with an unsatisfying and empty life.
Though she was not physically imprisoned like Esme, she is a prisoner of both convention and the betrayal of the sister she loved.
My mother felt that there was a further mystery regarding Alex and Iris. She wondered if Kitty’s reaction to their discovered embrace on the landing was meant as a clue that Alex and Iris were, in fact, brother and sister. I read over the parts regarding their childhood and as Alex’s father was named George, not James (or Jamie), that must have just been a misconception.
I too am puzzled about Esme’s remark about the sun not coming out a second time etc. but I think it’s clear what happened in the room when Alex and Iris were outside. Esme smothered Kitty with the pillow off the couch as an act of revenge for stealing her life.
It was an elemental act, perhaps years in the planning. I don’t think Esme would have felt any satisfaction in simply telling Iris the truth about her Grandmother and father.
A simply wonderful book. I can’t wait to read some of her others.
When Esme says that ” the sun didn’t go in…” was she refering to baby Hugo in some way. She held his body for days while the sun went in and out (rose and set). He was her brother. Kitty was her sister. Now Esme is the only “child” left.
This book made me want to talk to the author. It was definitely one of the most complex, mesmerizing mysteries I’ve ever read.
i finished the book last night after literally lusting after it every hour i missed out on a read. like many others, i had to read the last pages more than once. i convinced myself that Esme did not kill her sister. i guess she somehow fit my picture of earthly perfection to the best, despite the absence of justice in her life.
i figured that Duncan was impotent, and the shame of accepting the physical failing in that time was social suicide to say the least!
i agree with Mary Gail, about the sun not going in for Kitty as it did for Hugo. Part of me also believes that Hugo’s death changed Esme forever. We are not told that part of the story for nothing. the death of Hugo leaves Esme with a marked difference from the rest of her family. A sort of depth in death and life which her mother, father and sister can never comprehend.
Great book, i hope that one day, i can write something which leaves the reader awake as far into the night as Maggie left me.
Wow. What a powerful book! I found it at a secondhand bookstore for 60 pence, and it is one of the best literature purchases I have ever made.
I can’t help but feel sorry for Kitty. Considering her marriage, she would have had no knowledge of the term, much less the act, of rape, and I cannot blame her for assuming that Esme acted willingly with Jamie. Especially if she was already hurt that Jamie preferred Esme to herself.
When reading this, I also saw myself in Esme. It frightens me to no end to see the parallels and think that had I been born in this time, this book could very well have been about me.
The sun comment at the end also confused me, and reading it over and over hasn’t revealed much more. Esme was obviously waiting for something to happen with the sun, and when it didn’t she pulled the cord anyway. She knew that the nurses would come at the sound. Was she willingly giving herself up? Did she know that she could be punished for the act and not care, or did she think if she acted like she did nothing wrong, that she could get away with it? Either way, she got her revenge. Even though nothing can really bring back her wasted 61 years. It’s tragic when you think of who she might have become in today’s world.
i simply love the book..i read it in almost 6 hours just last october 31 ..for me,it is the best book i ever read this year and would love to read it over and over again..
this book is a gothic tale..a sad story of l0ss, jealousy,betrayal and seeking the truth..
though,many questions are left unanswered in the story’s final pages.
esme could have killed her sister,smothering her with the pillow but i just can’t take it to my mind what’s the use of the red cord?
esme is sane..she is not mentally illed..she may have been just affected by everything that had happen to her since she was young.the death of her ayah- jamilla,her brother- hugo and she was raped by the person she does not love – jamie dalziel..also she was not loved by her family..
it is such a haunting story that you would keep thinking abvout it even after you read it..unputtable..am looking forward to read other books by maggie.