It is a universal truth that a reader in want of a good read returns time and again to the backcatalogue of a favourite author. What’s less well known is that there is always one book that puts the dampers on the unmitigated enthusiasm.
I can be thankful, therefore, that Beware of Pity, was not my first encounter with Stefan Zweig because it would have been my last. I read Zweig for the intensity of the experience, emotional highs and lows like no other. His novellas and short stories are first-class and it is perhaps their brevity that makes them so. I recently read the collection 
Amok and Other Stories, the high point of which was the final story, Incident on Lake Geneva. A WWI Russian deserter is stranded in Switzerland while trying to make his way home. The man’s isolation, incomprehension and despair oozing from every syllable on the page despite his not being able to communicate with the Swiss villagers. Very involving, very painful, very dramatic. As a reader, I was devastated even though the ending had been foreshadowed from the start. Literary control, high emotion, short, sharp and very far from sweet, all in 10 pages.
That same intensity doesn’t map well, though, to a novel of 361 pages. It’s very wearing. More so when the narrative voice is monotonous and the situation doesn’t elicit sympathy from the reader. I found the tone more agonising than agony. A smidgeon of common sense and the whole drama/tragedy would have been avoided. Of course, that would have meant no novel, but perhaps it would have been better if Zweig had stuck to his favourite novella format.
He certainly retains novella-writing techniques in Beware of Pity. The pages are punctuated by stories within stories. The main event, itself, is sandwiched between a prologue and epilogue that take place many years later. An effect that works well in depicting the change in moral outlook brought on by World War I. After all, the conscience of a lieutenant, who has killed many, is no longer affected by the death of one individual to whom he had behaved less than honourably before the war.
Or had he? The epigram is telling:
THERE ARE TWO KINDS OF PITY
One, the weak and sentimental kind, which is really no more than the heart’s impatience to be rid as quickly as possible of the painful emotion aroused by the sight of another’s unhappiness that pity which is not compassion, but only an instinctive desire to fortify one’s own soul against the sufferings of another; and the other, the only kind that counts, the unsentimental but creative kind, which knows what it is about and is determined to hold out, in patience and forbearance, to the very limit of its strength and even beyond.
It’s a given that the lieutenant’s actions are governed by the first kind of pity but, instead of walking away after making a particularly blunt faux-pas at a ball (he asks a crippled girl to dance), he tries to rectify his error by befriending her. His motives are mistaken for romantic interest but instead of clarifying the situation early on, he allows himself to be sucked in. His honour as an officer in the Austro-Hungarian army is at stake. An author’s note emphasises that this sense of honour was tied to a special moral code, higher than that of society at general. A code that led to the mental conflict central to the book and a code that was shattered during the 1914-1918 war. Zweig seems to be saying that this dilemma couldn’t happen in the time he was writing of it and it certainly wouldn’t happen now. This reader simply wishes that it hadn’t happened at all.
Beware of Pity 
Amok and Other Stories 
(Incident on Lake Geneva 
)
34 years after its initial publication 
A quick virtual trolley dash (because the book’s not available at my library) and I found myself in possession of a delightful edition, published by Dodo Press. (Serendipity at work here as all those familiar with Fforde’s pet dodos will understand.) In addition to a rather incomprehensible mid-C19th introduction (let’s hear it for 21st century plain English), there’s a series of a dozen dark gothic drawings, emphasising the ominous foreboding atmosphere.
Amazingly, I have an 
The 
Jasper Fforde’s The Eyre Affair ticked (tickled?) all three of those boxes. 
At a recent reading, a member of the audience commented that she wanted to take the book home with her only if Barry himself would accompany it. He was that good and uproariously funny! I was sitting next to a couple of friends who had already read the novel. They both commented that it wasn’t at all the voice in which they had read the book. Excellent, I thought, sometimes being behind the times is an advantage after all.
of the best ghost stories of all time and that’s possibly why I’d never read it. Not my genre at all. Still reading trails converging is a sign not to be ignored.
Fortunately John Self has now written 
Books 1 and 2 have been named. Look in the special desert island box on the right. —> Today I’m adding Janice Galloway’s Clara to the list. It’s the finest historical novel I’ve read. Full, glowing, even gushing, review 
Other literary events this week. 
I was delighted to see Kolymsky Heights in his list. “The best thriller I’ve ever read” says Pullman. “The first thriller I ever read” says Lizzy and the seed that sowed a reading addiction!
